News

Here, Aaron Di Blasi, Publisher for the Top Tech Tidbits and Access Information News weekly newsletters, takes on the complaint he hears most often from one-time advertisers: “no one clicked on my ad.” His answer opens with a thought experiment. Imagine you advertise a genuine $1,000 giveaway to a list of roughly 45,000 subscribers, how many of them would not respond? The point isn’t the money; it’s what the exercise proves: the audience on the other end of the advertisement is alive, engaged, and quick to act when an offer actually speaks to them. Di Blasi backs that up with hard evidence, noting that the TTT and AIN subscriber lists were recently run through LinkedIn’s Matched Audience service for the first time, with the results published openly on both publications’ audience pages so advertisers can see definitively who they are reaching every week.

There is a sentence in the public materials of a Vancouver-based assistive-technology retailer that I have not been able to…

How a year-long teacher exchange to Australia in 2010, three years before that country’s National Disability Insurance Scheme launched, quietly…

Here, Aaron Di Blasi, publisher for Top Tech Tidbits, makes the case that the most consequential accessibility architecture in a decade arrived almost without notice on April 27, 2026, when OpenAI quietly published openai/realtime-voice-component to GitHub. Built on top of the gpt-realtime-1.5 audio model and demonstrated through a wake-word persona named “Chappy,” the open-source React reference implementation inverts twenty years of voice-agent design: instead of taking screenshots and simulating clicks, the model is handed a structured set of tools by the application and invokes them directly, eliminating the screen-reader-plus-dictation friction stack that has frustrated blind and low-vision users for two decades.

Here, Aaron Di Blasi, Publisher of Access Information News and PR Director of AT-Newswire, introduces his 43,000+ weekly readers to Cam Wells, a Windsor, Ontario-based journalist, disability advocate, and stroke survivor who has hosted and produced Handi-Link on CJAM 99.1 FM for 18 years, making it Canada’s longest-running disability radio program. The article traces how Di Blasi and Wells connected in April 2026 after Wells reached out in response to an Access Information News newsletter, and profiles the full scope of Wells’s work: a nationally syndicated weekly radio show that has featured guests from Bill Nye to former Ontario Lieutenant Governor David Onley, co-authorship of the NCRA’s national disAbilities Handbook on radio accessibility, an 18-chapter Accessible Diversity curriculum, and ongoing roles at the Italian Canadian HandiCapable Association and as a regular research consultant with the National Organization for Rare Disorders.

Here, Aaron Di Blasi, Director for the AT-Newsire PR service and Publisher of the Top Tech Tidbits weekly newsletter, explains why SensePilot immediately stood out to him as more than just another assistive technology product. After connecting with Mike Hazlewood and learning more about the platform, Aaron argues that the real story is not simply that SensePilot enables hands-free Windows control through head movement, facial gestures, and speech, but that it does so using a standard webcam and an access model that lowers cost, setup complexity, and hardware dependency. From Aaron’s perspective as both a publisher and an engineer, that combination makes SensePilot especially relevant to the AT community because it points toward a more scalable, practical future for access.

Here, Aaron Di Blasi, Director for the AT-Newswire PR Service, explains that the 2024 ADA Title II web accessibility rule for state and local government websites and mobile apps remains fully in force, even as anxiety grows around a possible unpublished change now under review inside DOJ and OIRA. The article’s core message is that nothing has been rolled back yet: WCAG 2.1 Level AA remains the operative standard, and the existing compliance deadlines still stand. What has changed is the process. DOJ appears to have shifted from a more ordinary rulemaking path to the faster, less transparent interim-final-rule route, and that has disability advocates, public entities, and vendors all watching closely.

Here, Aaron Di Blasi contrasts the promise of vast digitized archives, university repositories, public records, historic newspapers, special collections, with the reality that blind and print-disabled users are often locked out because the content lives in inaccessible PDFs and page images. He explains why legacy archives are uniquely hard to make accessible at scale: the sheer volume can reach tens or hundreds of millions of pages, usage follows a “long tail” where you can’t predict what will matter next, legal expectations are rising, and one-time remediation projects are expensive, incomplete, and quickly outdated, leaving “islands” of accessibility in a sea of inaccessible content.

Here, Aaron Di Blasi argues that most organizations handle document accessibility through reactive “fire drills”, a student, employee, or customer can’t read a PDF, the request gets routed to a specialist or vendor, and an accessible version eventually appears, only for the cycle to repeat. He explains why this breaks at scale: organizations underestimate document volume, face huge variation in formats and complexity (born-digital vs. scans, tables, forms, math, charts), rely on exception-driven workflows, and confront the high cost of manual remediation, leaving people with disabilities waiting, excluded, or forced to depend on others for access.

Here, Aaron Di Blasi describes a familiar failure mode in enterprise remote support: organizations deploy “best-in-class” remote tools that work fine for most staff, but quietly shut out blind and low-vision technicians and users because the experience assumes a sighted operator and a primarily visual interface. He explains how this accessibility gap shows up in day-to-day support, workarounds like putting a phone on speaker so a technician can hear a user’s screen reader, longer “tell me what you see” calls, and capable blind IT professionals being excluded from frontline rotations, ultimately driving slower resolution times, inconsistent support quality, and a widening mismatch between stated accessibility commitments and actual workflows.